Lower Burrell, Apollo drivers remain hospitalized after head-on collision in Allegheny Township
Two people injured in Tuesday afternoon's head-on collision on Melwood Road in Allegheny Township remained hospitalized Wednesday.
Charles Makara, 23, of Oregon Drive, Lower Burrell, was in critical condition in UPMC Presbyterian, Pittsburgh, after he was airlifted there.
Jennifer Shannon, 40, of Terrace Avenue, Apollo, was in fair condition in Forbes Regional Hospital, Monroeville.
Police said they are continuing to investigate.
On Tuesday police said it appeared that Makara's car crossed the center line and collided with a van driven by Shannon. Police said the car was being driven toward Lower Burrell.
Police Chief John Fontaine said Wednesday that police have impounded Makara's Chevrolet Cobalt and Shannon's Dodge Caravan.
“We have preliminary information,” he said. “It's too early in the investigation to tell what happened.”
Police will interview the drivers when that becomes possible. They also will check vehicle computers if necessary to determine the speed of the accident.
There was no sign of locked brakes or skid marks, police said.
The accident happened just past where Melwood Road forms a “Y” with Markle Road. There have been several accidents there, police said.
“This is the third major accident there,” Fontaine said. “About 20 feet from Tuesday's accident, you can see guardrail crumpled from a wreck within the past 30 days. An earlier wreck involved a DUI driver.”
Chuck Biedka is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4711 or email@example.com.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.