O'Hara community center plans stalled by need to rebid site work
O'Hara Council on Tuesday night delivered unwanted news to supporters of a new $8.2 million community center.
Contract proposals for site work on the Powers Run Road facility had to be rebid, stalling the project at least one month.
Other bids for electrical, plumbing and general contracting are being reviewed.
Members of the Community Center Board, who were not at the meeting, hoped that contract bids would be awarded this week and a groundbreaking would follow this summer.
Barb Satler, interim executive director, could not be immediately reached for comment.
Plans call for a 28,000-square-foot center to be built on the same 11-acre campus where the existing facility sits.
The new site will include a gym, multi-purpose room, meeting space and a cafe. It will replace the current Boyd Community Center where leaders said programs have outgrown the classroom space in the 32-year-old former elementary school.
With a capital campaign under way more than three years, volunteers are closing in on the total cost. At last count, Satler said organizers were within $500,000.
Councilman Bart Bodkin said funding will squarely determine whether council votes to move forward.
Council President Bob Smith said new bids for site work will be opened at 7 p.m. July 1.
“It's our hope that we will vote on July 8,” he said.
Tawnya Panizzi is a writer with Trib Total Media. She can be reached at email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.