West Deer man dies in Route 910 crash in Harmar
A West Deer man died Wednesday afternoon when his car drifted into oncoming traffic on Route 910 in Harmar, according to police.
Ezra Briggs, 24, was pronounced dead at the scene at around 4 p.m. by Lower Valley EMS personnel. His official cause of death is pending an autopsy from the Allegheny County Medical Examiner's Office.
Harmar police Chief Jason Domaratz said Briggs was heading toward Indiana Township in a two-door car around 3:45 p.m. when he lost control on a bend near Locust Hill Road. His car began to spin downhill into the opposite lane and was struck on the passenger side by an oncoming SUV.
Upon impact, the Kia SUV overturned into an embankment on the side of the road, and came to a rest about 2 feet away from Briggs' silver car.
The driver of the Kia, Mark Dodd, 44, of Elizabeth, got out of his SUV on his own power. He was taken to UPMC Presbyterian hospital in Pittsburgh by Lower Valley EMS as a “precaution,” according to Domaratz.
The nature of his injuries was unknown, but they did not appear life-threatening, Domaratz said. A condition report from UPMC Presbyterian was unavailable late Wednesday.
Harmar police and the Allegheny Valley Volunteer Fire Company closed Route 910 from Locust Hill Road to Commerce Drive for about three hours while Allegheny County detectives investigated.
Domaratz said skid marks on the road indicate that Briggs may have tried to pass another car on the shoulder of the road before he lost control.
Speed was likely a factor, he said.
Both Dodd and Briggs were traveling alone.
Braden Ashe is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4673 or email@example.com.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.