Winfield Township man pleads guilty to fake bomb threat
A Winfield Township man has pleaded guilty to brandishing a fake bomb while robbing a Buffalo Township pharmacy in October.
Kenneth K. Miller, 29, of Winfield is facing 15 months to five years in prison under a plea bargain. His sentencing is scheduled in August after a pre-sentence investigation.
Miller pleaded guilty on Wednesday to robbery at the Colonial Pharmacy along Ekastown Road in Buffalo Township on Oct. 28.
According to Buffalo Township police, a masked man walked into the store at about 8 p.m. and set a box with wires on the counter and demanded painkillers “for his sick brother.”
Pharmacy owner Ethan Schwartz told him the drugs were locked up, and the robber left empty-handed.
Police found Miller in a nearby parking lot. They said he was wearing the same camouflage pants and dark hooded sweatshirt that the would-be robber wore.
In an affidavit, police said they found a fake bomb — a white box with wires attached — inside a bag in Miller's truck. The box contained soap.
Police found a handgun that wasn't seen during the robbery.
Miller “could have received much more,” Public Defender Joseph Leonard Smith said on Thursday.
He said the DA's office at first offered a five- to 10-year sentence.
Assistant District Attorney Patricia McClain confirmed the 15 month to five-year sentence that is being offered, pending a Butler County judge's approval.
Smith said Miller has no prior record and that helped his cause during plea negotiations.Miller was initially charged with 17 offenses including three robbery counts, bomb threats, having a weapon of mass destruction and reckless endangerment.
In exchange for pleading guilty to robbery, McClain dropped the 16 others.
Chuck Biedka is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4711 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.