Upper Burrell couple pleads in vain for PennDOT to erect guardrail to protect home
PennDOT says it would be a liability for it to install a guardrail on Seventh Street Road across from Manchester Hill Road in Upper Burrell.
The area doesn't meet the agency's “comprehensive design criteria,” a spokeswoman said.
“If an accident were to occur and someone was injured or killed (due to the guardrail), the state could be sued,” said spokeswoman Valerie Petersen. “We can't just place guiderail anywhere.”
PennDOT maintains its stance after another vehicle crash last week at the intersection — the 16th in the last 25 years, according to Gil and Mary Lou Schrock, that a vehicle has ended up in their yard.
This time, a pickup took out the corner of their shed. The last time, in 2012, a car careened into their sunroom, missing the room their son was in by mere inches.
“They need to do something,” said Mary Lou Schrock as she stood looking at the damage Friday afternoon.
The Schrocks said they have repeatedly asked PennDOT to install a guardrail and plan to do so again.
But the response likely will be similar to those in the past, based on information provided by Petersen.
“Since a guiderail, itself, is an obstruction which can cause considerable damage to a vehicle and a motorist, it is installed only when comprehensive design criteria are met,” Petersen said, using PennDOT's term for a guardrail.
PennDOT conducted a traffic study in the area and had an engineer review the guardrail request, she said.
“The traffic engineer determined that due to vertical height and slope, it doesn't meet the criteria and it cannot be installed,” Petersen said.
The agency put in a double-ended directional arrow at the edge of the Schrocks' yard along Route 780 facing Manchester Hill Road.
Township Supervisor Ross Walker III said the supervisors likely would write to PennDOT on the Schrocks' behalf.
The township can't install a barrier because Seventh Street Road (Route 780) is a state road. It did put up a warning sign on Manchester Hill Road about 300 feet from the intersection at the top of the hill.
The township has been unsuccessful in its previous requests for a guardrail, Walker said.
“It seems like a guiderail would probably help,” he said. “I don't think it would have to be a big piece. It would be a shame if it takes a death for PennDOT to take action.”
Last Thursday's crash
At least two people were injured on Thursday when a person driving a pickup came off of Manchester Hill Road and collided with a car traveling on Route 780, Upper Burrell police said.
The truck traveled the 120 feet through the Schrocks' yard and into their shed, police said.
The occupants of the car suffered non-life-threatening injuries, police said.
Police did not return multiple calls seeking an update on the accident and whether charges would be filed.
Drivers on Manchester Hill come up a hill to a stop sign where the road levels out slightly at its intersection with Route 780.
Accidents have mainly been the result of speeding and drunken driving, according to a PennDOT review of crash data.
After the 2012 accident, Gil Schrock installed 11 3,000-pound boulders along the front yard near the road. They are illuminated with Christmas lights year round to make them visible to drivers.
In the recent accident, the truck entered the yard just to the right of the rock barrier.
Jodi Weigand is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4702 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Long-awaited bridge expected to be completed in June
- Filming for Cinemax TV series to divert traffic in Allegheny Township
- State’s homeless rate begins to decrease
- Gas industry, rural character top Winfield candidates’ list
- Turbine touted as ‘green’ to power historic Penn Township barn
- Pittsburgh man taken for wild ride on Route 28
- Marathoner hit by vehicle in Murrysville recuperates
- Inaction means New Kensington-Arnold superintendent likely will keep job
- FirstEnergy halfway into 72-day, $60 million upgrade of Springdale facility
- Volunteers devote day to furthering projects in A-K Valley