Share This Page

Former Armstrong County prison guard arrested in heroin bust

| Friday, June 20, 2014, 7:13 a.m.

A former part-time Armstrong County prison guard is charged with having almost five bricks of heroin in a car stopped for speeding in Vandergrift, police said.

Patrolman Bill Moore said former guard Amanda Crusan, 28, and Jeremy Ogrosky, 33, both of 14 N. Fourth St., Clairton, are charged with possessing and selling drugs.

Moore said police found 230 heroin packets in a black sock. Crusan allegedly hid five stamp bags on her person.

Moore, who works with the state Attorney General's drug task force, said he pulled the car over for driving 45 mph in a 25 mph zone along Hancock Avenue just before 4 p.m. Wednesday.

Police said Crusan's two children, ages 5 and 8, were inside the car.

Moore said they were turned over to Crusan's ex-husband.

Police Chief Joseph Caporali said the arrest was one of the largest heroin busts in Vandergrift.

Moore said 235 heroin packets have a street value of about $2,350.

Armstrong County Jail Warden David Hogue said Crusan worked at the jail for about a year but hasn't been there for about two years. He said she left to take another job.

In January, Crusan pleaded guilty to driving without a license in Penn Hills and a retail theft charge in Kiski Township.

In 2007, an Allegheny County judge sentenced Ogrosky to serve 5 to 10 years for robbery in Penn Hills.

Chuck Biedka is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.