Fawn officials brace for roadwork
Fawn officials are sure there will be a lot of road work in the township in the coming weeks.
They're just not sure how much of a hassle it will cause for motorists.
PennDOT is getting ready to repair a retaining wall along Bull Creek Road next week, according to Fawn Township officials.
State transportation officials, however, have not provided any information about the possibility of one-way traffic or other delays.
The stone wall supports Bull Creek Road along a large bend in the creek near Iron Bridge Lane. The busy road has only one lane in each direction with few nearby side streets that could provide a detour.
Next week, PennDOT will provide displays in the Fawn municipal building illustrating two bridges that will be repaired next year.
One bridge is along Thomson-Dawson Road near Bull Creek Rod and Gun Club and the other along Millerstown Road (Route 908) near the intersection with Bull Creek Road. An exact date for those projects has not been set.
In other road matters, Senate Engineering, the township's engineer, will meet within the next 10 days with El Grande Industries to try and set up repairs to a collapsed shoulder along Mason Road.
Fawn officials need a commitment to repair that part of Mason before the township's road bond expires in October.
Senate is also slated to propose two options to supervisors to repair an area of Thompson Road that is collapsing near a bridge.
One solution reportedly is soil compaction at the site and the other is a gabion basket near the side of the road.
“We're trying to be proactive with the situation on Thompson,” said Supervisors Chairman David Montanari.
George Guido is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.