Arnold police chief kills dog he says attacked him
Arnold police Chief Willie Weber said he was forced to fatally shoot a dog that attacked him on Monday.
Weber said he responded to a complaint of unrestrained dogs hanging out the window of a house at 1635 Fourth Ave.
Weber said he was walking on the sidewalk about 10 feet from the house about 2:30 p.m. when two pit bulls, one male adult and one puppy, jumped from a first-floor window.
The puppy stayed in the yard, Weber said, but the gray-and-white adult dog charged, biting Weber's left thigh before the chief was able shake the dog off into the street.
When the dog charged again and bared its teeth, Weber said he had no choice but to fire three shots that killed the dog.
The dog was not wearing a collar, according to the chief. Weber said Delmont-based Hoffman Kennels retrieved the dog's body and will investigate whether it was vaccinated or licensed.
Weber said charges against the owner are pending the result of Hoffman's research.
The chief said the dog's teeth did not pierce his skin and he was not injured in the attack.
Weber said no one was home at the time and the owner had not yet contacted police Monday evening.
The dogs' owner, Velvet Morris, tearfully apologized for the incident in an interview with WPXI-TV.
Weber said he didn't believe police had been called to the house before for dog-related problems. However, he said neighbors who witnessed the incident reported having concerns about the dogs being loose in the past.
Liz Hayes is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4680 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.