Harrison considers options for Pittsburgh Heritage Trail through township
Several route options will be available when the Pittsburgh Heritage Trail comes through Harrison Township.
Officials met on Monday with representatives of Friends of the Riverfront to discuss the trail that will wind along the western side of the Allegheny River starting in Pittsburgh and meet subsequent trails in Butler, Westmoreland and Armstrong counties.
The Harrison section will attach to the Brackenridge section along First Avenue, go through the Natrona section of Harrison and through township property near the Lock & Dam No. 4.
That's where the trail becomes tricky.
Organizers are looking at three options to continue the trail northeast from the dam:
• Continue through the Karns section of Harrison along the railroad tracks toward Freeport.
The drawback is the considerable number of trains using the Norfolk Southern tracks.
ATI-Allegheny Ludlum officials told the Harrison contingent that the company might use the railroad more frequently for shipping goods.
Plus, tentative plans are to hook up Freeport Borough's ailing sewerage system with the Upper Allegheny Valley authority, using an area near the rail bed.
• Taking the trial along Spring Hill Road, reducing that artery from four lanes to three, allotting the lane closest to Alsco Park to the trail, then winding the trail along old Route 28.
• Connecting the trial with Harrison Hills Park. But the drop-off between the park and the railroad tracks near Butler Junction is too steep, making it dangerous for families and young children to bicycle the trail.
No final decision has been made.
George Guido is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.