ShareThis Page

Allegheny Valley Hospital reduces readmissions by checking up on patients at home

| Monday, Aug. 11, 2014, 12:56 a.m.

The doctor sat in Valerie Robinson's apartment and marveled at the number of pill bottles she kept in a zippered bag.

“Holy schmoley, girl!” Dr. Rick Fogle said as he sorted through the medications in Robinson's Harrison high-rise.

Checking the drugs against a list, Fogle concluded that more than half were not part of her official medical record. Within two hours, he discovered that Robinson's doctor had moved offices and she needed a new doctor.

Without this rare home visit, Robinson, 65, likely would end up hospitalized, Fogle said. To avoid this, hospitals focus on patients such as Robinson and send doctors to their homes, hoping to prevent readmissions.

“We go outside the walls of the hospital for early recognition of symptoms going bad,” said Lori Shotts, a registered nurse who is part of a so-called “high-risk care team” that tracks patients at risk for readmission to Allegheny Valley Hospital. “We want to keep the patient at home where they want to be.”

The hospital's approach is fueled partly by the government's goal to curb readmissions, which cost an estimated $12 billion in Medicare spending. Three-quarters of readmissions are preventable, according to an analysis of claims data by the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services in 2012 began imposing fines on hospitals that readmit too many patients within a month of discharge. Records show Allegheny Valley in the past two years received among the steepest fines for hospitals in Western Pennsylvania — 1 percent of its Medicare reimbursement.

Penalties nationwide have averaged about $127,000 per hospital every year.

Experts say the fines have pushed hospitals to send workers to patients' homes, where they might learn some people can't get a handle on their health. The task falls primarily on nurses; it's unusual for doctors to visit homes, said Dr. Karen Joynt, an instructor at Harvard University School of Public Health who studies readmissions.

“Some patients are so complex, it makes a ton of sense for a physician to visit those homes,” Joynt said.

Fogle, who began working for Allegheny Health Network in June, said most patients at risk for readmission are those who have trouble with medications — taking the wrong dosage, or trying to juggle multiple drugs prescribed by doctors who didn't communicate with each other.

“It's always the meds. It's our society. Everybody thinks a pill will make them better. If one pill won't do it, they want another one. It's a pharmaceutical nation,” he said.

Who gets home visits

The impetus to address readmissions at Allegheny Valley came in March 2012 when administrators noted just over 19 percent of patients were returning within a month of discharge.

They formed the high-risk care team — nurses, social workers and paramedics — to meet daily and review details of recently discharged patients they suspected might return. Most such patients are elderly, with diabetes, congestive heart failure or other chronic conditions.

They follow no specific guidelines when deciding who should get a home visit.

“It's just a feeling,” said Fogle, 61, who was an Army physician in Afghanistan and is a brigade surgeon for the Pennsylvania National Guard. “If it looks like every 21 days that patient is coming back, we figure, let's hit him on Day 19 and stop him from coming back in.”

Robinson fit the bill. The former mental health counselor is diabetic and was hospitalized more than 10 times in a six-month period — for symptoms such as chest pain, shortness of breath, back pain and headaches.

When Fogle asked to look at her medications, she gave him a container with 16 pill bottles. As he checked them, she produced two plastic bins filled with medicines, ointments, vitamins and medical supplies.

“I never throw my bottles out,” said Robinson, who sat in a bed in her living room, near the kitchen and a large, flat-screen TV.

Fogle and Shotts discarded about a dozen of Robinson's pills bottles. Shotts pricked Robinson's finger to test her blood in a glucometer. Later, she listened to her lungs.

When Robinson told Fogle that her doctor moved to the Bloomfield section of Pittsburgh, he promised to make an appointment for her with another doctor.

“It's right here, right around the corner. You can power-chair over there,” he joked. “Is that a deal? Keep you out of the hospital?”

She nodded and smiled. And having a physician check on her at home should help her stay healthy, she said.

“I get confused about the medicines,” she said.

Expanding the practice

Officials at Allegheny Health Network consider the program successful enough to try at other hospitals.

Readmission rates at Allegheny Valley dropped to 11.8 percent in May, the lowest since officials recorded the 19.2 percent readmission rate in March 2012.

UPMC Health Plan started a similar program about a month ago that is run by doctors from an internal medicine practice at UPMC Montefiore in Oakland. The program has enrolled 20 patients, said Dr. Jodie Bryk, who leads the program with Dr. Gary Fischer.

“We're trying to get out of the practice of you coming to the hospital to be seen,” Bryk said. “Patients are better off if they stay at home.”

Luis Fábregas is Trib Total Media's medical editor. Reach him at 412-320-7998 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.