New Kensington-Arnold approves tentative, 3-year contract with teachers
The New Kensington-Arnold School Board on Thursday approved a tentative agreement with the district's teachers union, whose current contract expires on Sunday.
Superintendent John Pallone said details would not be released until the union approves the contract.
It was presented as a three-year deal that would expire at the end of the 2016-17 school year.
Connie Vita, president of the New Kensington-Arnold Education Association, said a vote by the teachers has not been scheduled. The union represents about 180 teachers.
“I would like to thank the board for agreeing to this tentative agreement,” she said.
The board unanimously approved the agreement with member Jason Fularz abstaining because his wife is a district teacher.
A representative with the Pennsylvania State Education Association, the local union's parent organization, earlier this month expressed concern that a tentative agreement wouldn't be reached because the two sides hadn't met since June.
She noted the district this summer was busy planning for the start of the school year that involved closing schools and moving classrooms to consolidate, likely a distraction from the bargaining process.
The last contract was a three-year deal, approved about six months late in February 2012, that froze wages in the first year and offered raises of 1 percent to 2 percent in the following years.
During the budget-planning process this spring, Pallone said the board had not factored teacher raises into this school year's financial plan; only annual salary-step movement was budgeted.
Liz Hayes is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4680 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.