Chartiers Valley's diesel fuel contract to save money
How would you like to pay $2.86 a gallon for gas?
“I think most people would want that (deal) now,” said Nick Morelli, business director at Chartiers Valley School District.
Chartiers Valley is one of 22 school districts paying that amount — not for regular gasoline, but for the diesel fuel its buses use. The contract runs until June 30, 2013.
In 2011-12, Chartiers Valley paid $3.14 a gallon for diesel fuel.
This marks a savings of 45 cents a gallon, money that will go toward purchases in other parts of the budget, Morelli said.
“We are obviously very excited about it. Anytime you can save money like that, it is something to be grateful and excited about,” said Morelli, a member of the Allegheny Intermediate Consortium Committee.
This is the committee that solicited multiple bids for the diesel fuel contract, and eventually locked into a contract with Petroleum Trader Corp. of Indiana, Pa., for $286,000.
Forty-five area school districts are members of the Allegheny Intermediate Unit Consortium; however, only 22 purchase diesel fuel.
The AIU buys more than 3 million gallons of diesel fuel a year, Morelli said. Of that, Chartiers Valley buys about 100,000 gallons for its 57 buses.
Forty-three of the buses transport 72 students, and 14 are passenger vans that can carry 24 students, Morelli said.
Although he was not specific, Superintendent Brian White said he is looking forward to using the extra money for “instructional purposes.”
“That's what we want to do with it. It will go straight there,” White said last week.
The Allegheny Intermediate Unit Consortium will begin looking at the gas price trends again at the beginning of the year, Morelli said. Bids will be sought sometime in May.
Jeff Widmer is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5810 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.