ShareThis Page

School resource officers expected at all buildings

| Wednesday, Dec. 26, 2012, 9:31 p.m.

Chartiers Valley School District administrators continue to work with area police about placing school resource officers at district schools.

This comes after a report circulated that there would be an “act of violence” last week at the high school on Thoms Run Road in Collier.

That rumor was deemed to be unfounded, according to co-principals Tom Samosky and Amy Wodnicki. It was reported to Collier police, who investigated the matter and also found the threat to be unwarranted.

It is not known what the specific act of violence might be. Collier police did speak to some students, and found the threat to be “unsubstantiated,” the district said.

In a Dec. 18 letter to parents and posted on the Chartiers Valley School District website, Samosky and Wodnicki wrote that the district “takes all rumors and reports of violence seriously and reports them to the appropriate police department.”

Collier police are responsible for the middle/high school campus and primary school on Thoms Run Road, and Scott police respond to incidents at the intermediate school on Swallow Hill Road.

Meanwhile, there still are plans in place for Chartiers Valley to place school resource officers at all of its schools, following the shootings last month at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Conn.

Superintendent Brian White reviewed school safety measures and plans with Collier police Chief Tom Devine and Scott police Chief Jim Secreet. As a result, Chartiers Valley has sent requests to Collier to establish a school resource officer program.

The same request has been sent to Scott.

It is not known when the program would be put into place, how much it would cost or how the program would be paid for. District officials have not determined if the officers would carry handguns.

Jeff Widmer is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5810 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.