Heidelberg man charged after incident with minors
A Heidelberg man has been charged with unlawful restraint of a minor and harassment after an incident involving two Carnegie Elementary students at a bus stop Thursday morning.
Stanley J. Patterson, 60, of Heidelberg allegedly approached two children, ages 7 and 8, at the intersection of West Main and Sixth streets at around 8 a.m. Thursday.
Police said Patterson put his hands on the shoulder of one of the children, who immediately broke away. The children, who are siblings, ran to their home nearby.
“I don't know what his motivation was, but immediately when the children sensed danger, they did the right thing,” Carnegie police Chief Jeff Harbin said.
Harbin said the child's father spotted the man walking east on Main Street and confronted him. The father took a picture of the suspect with his cell phone and called police.
Carnegie police investigated and sent the photo to Port Authority, and a bus driver recognized Patterson as one of his passengers. Green Tree police responded to the bus on Noblestown Road, and Carnegie police took Patterson into custody at 8:32 a.m.
Harbin said Patterson claimed to be a preacher.
Patterson was arraigned before Magisterial District Judge Dennis Joyce and was remanded to Allegheny County Jail. He must be cleared by the jail's behavioral clinic before his release on a $5,000 10 percent bond.
“I'm just glad that we were able to make a quick arrest in this,” Harbin said. “Obviously, with what happened in Newtown, if we did not get this individual, there would have been some heightened anxiety in the community.”
Doug Gulasy is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-8527 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.