Scott Township board sets tax rate
Scott Township's Board of Commissioners took care of two lingering issues at its last meeting of the year Dec. 27.
In unanimous votes, the board approved a 2013 budget of $9.9 million and set the property tax rate for the year at 4.457 mills, a drop from 5 mills in 2012.
The tax rate breaks down to 4.3794 mills for Scott's general purpose fund and .0776 for the library. It was set after the township received certified assessment values from Allegheny County, but the ongoing appeals process could result in some problems.
“We still have a concern about all of the assessment appeals that are coming in, and we're hoping that the millage rate we set will coincide with all of the appeals we receive,” manager Denise Fitzgerald said.
The budget includes:
• $2,949,141 for the township's police department, an increase of $178,615 from 2012.
• $508,170 for fire protection.
• $2,161,754 for public works, an increase of $746,246 from a year ago. Road construction and rebuilding projects accounted for a large portion of the increase.
Overall, the budget could use $1.7 million from its fund balance, leaving it with $3 at year's end. However, Fitzgerald said that is a worst-case estimate.
“I'm very conservative on revenues and aggressive on expenditures” when making a budget, she said.
Doug Gulasy is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-8527 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Officials concerned expansion plan for South Fayette intersection might not be enough
- Carnegie boy gets to be mayor for a day