Bridgeville 2013 budget still without a set millage
Bridgeville Borough has passed its 2013 budget, but has yet to set its 2013 millage.
This probably will happen before the next council meeting in February.
The property tax rate now stands at 6.75 mills, said Manager Lori Collins. Council's finance committee will discuss the millage at least one more time before the entire borough council meets on Feb. 11.
Whatever the case, the rate will go down, Collins said.
“That is because of the reassessments. We are seeing that everywhere. I think you might see (council) make a move on the millage rate at its next meeting,” Collins said.
Bridgeville has 17 full-time employees. All of them agreed to a one-year wage freeze in 2012, Collins said.
“This helped us immensely. When you think about it, the fact that these employees were ready to do that shows dedication to the borough and to their jobs,” Collins said.
Bridgeville's 2013 budget totals $2,547,108 and was passed in December. Some numbers from the budget include:
• Police, $774,449 (including eight full-time and three full-time police officers); police Chief Chad King is set to make $78,322 in 2013, Collins said.
• Public works department, $296,418.
• Administration, $159,136.
The cost for health benefits has gone up 8 percent to $522,234 a year, Collins said.
No major improvements are planned for Bridgeville's three main parks – McLaughlin Run Road, Chartiers and Cook School parks, Collins said.
Jeff Widmer is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5810 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.