Povirk to be school resource officer at Chartiers Valley School District intermediate campus
One of three school resource officers in Chartiers Valley School District could begin as early as Friday at the intermediate school in Scott Township.
Ed Povirk, a 21-year veteran of the Scott police who retired in 2005, will be the school resource officer at the intermediate school.
“I'm very excited for the opportunity,” said Povirk, a former DARE officer. “I am looking forward to making this program successful.”
The two Collier officers assigned to the middle school/high school campus will begin Feb. 4, said police Chief Tom Devin. Steve Oberle will be the school resource officer for the primary school, while Bill Oslick will be at the middle school/high school campus.
The district will have one police officer at each campus.
“The SROs at the high school/middle school campus and the intermediate school will be a permanent face around our schools,” district Superintendent Brian White said.
Like thousands of schools across the U.S., Chartiers Valley began discussing posting police in its buildings following the mass killing at Sandy Hook Elementary on Dec. 14 in Newtown, Conn.
Former student Adam Lanza fatally shot 20 first-graders, six adults and himself in the building by shooting his way through a glass door.
School resource officers work with teachers, police and parents to help idenitify potential problems in a school, while also offering additional security.
At Chartiers Valley, the district will use $270,000 from its reserve funds to reimburse the Scott and Collier township's $7,500 a month per-officer. The officers will be employees of the Collier and Scott police departments.
Jeff Widmer is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5810 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.