Heidelberg responds to firefighter's plight
The Heidelberg community is supporting a borough firefighter whose home was destroyed in a blaze last week.
The fire at 476 First St., which occurred in the early-morning hours of March 21, left Heidelberg volunteer firefighter Jason Adkins and his family homeless.
“With Heidelberg being as small a community as it is and close-knit as it is, any fire's tough,” Heidelberg fire Chief Joe Wissel Jr. said. “But a fire that affects your department, being one of your member's homes, is a lot tougher than I wanted to know.”
Adkins, a seven-year member of the Heidelberg Volunteer Fire Department, lived in the home with his wife, two young sons, father, grandmother and two dogs — all of whom escaped safely. The family is staying in a hotel temporarily as it looks for a new home.
The department is accepting donations for the family. Wissel said a number of clothes donations came in, and top priorities now are household goods and sporting goods for the two boys.
Donations can be sent to Heidelberg Volunteer Fire Department at 456 First St. in Heidelberg. Wissel asks that donations be marked “Attention: Firefighter Adkins Relief Fund.” In addition, donations can be sent to Kirwan Heights Volunteer Fire Department and Rennerdale Volunteer Fire Department.
Wissel also said the department will organize fundraisers for Adkins in the future, though nothing official is planned at this time.
Doug Gulasy is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-8527 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.