Carlynton board pays bills, approves coaches
The Carlynton school board held its monthly meeting Thursday, where it approved a number of financial transactions.
Payment of bills for the month of March was approved for the amount of $2,462,958.74.
In addition, the board voted to approve both the March athletic fund report and activities fund report with an ending balance of $12,797.35 and $47,542.94, respectively.
The board also approved the sale of a 1986 grounds equipment trailer to Carnegie Borough for $1.
The board approved the following coaching appointments for the 2013-14 school year.
• Michael Kozy, varsity boys' basketball
• Tim Bonner, varsity girls' basketball
• Rachel Smith, varsity cheerleading
• James Bassano, varsity golf
• Charles Dagnal, varsity boys' soccer
• David Zinski, varsity girls' soccer
• James Glaser, varsity girls' tennis
• Emily Tupi, varsity volleyball
The board also approved appointments for 20 sponsor and director positions.
Kathleen Spinnenweber was appointed a temporary lunchroom and playground aide at Crafton Elementary, and Laura Swell was hired as a cafeteria worker at Carnegie Elementary.
In other business, action was tabled regarding the Parent Request for Exclusion policy. The policy deals with a parent's right to opt their child out of a PSSA or Keystone exam.
Megan Guza is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5810 or email@example.com.
Add Megan Guza to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.