Plenty of choices for voters in Collier primary, neighboring elections
While the Nov. 11 general election still is months away, election season already is upon the area with the May 21 primary.
Twenty-nine candidates are vying for spots on November's ballot throughout Bridgeville, Carnegie, Collier, Chartiers Valley and Scott.
Most races in the area won't be contested until after the primary, when the field is narrowed down for the general election.
In Collier, four Republicans will be running for three spots on the November ballot: Wayne Chiurazzi, Charles Hackett, Jason Oskamp and Kevin Vaughn. Two Democrats are running for the three Democratic ballot spots: Mary Ann Cupples Wisniowski and Nichole Kauer.
Township manager Sal Sirabella said the fact that three incumbent commissioners are not seeking re-election is helping to contribute to the high volume of candidates.
Chartiers Valley will have six candidates run for four school-board positions. Candidates are cross-filed, meaning they are running on both the Republican and Democratic tickets. They include incumbents Jeff Choura and Debra Rice and newcomers Eric Kraemer, Anthony Mazzarini Jr., Julie Murphy and Alka Patel.
In Carnegie, the only contested primary race is that between Democrats Bob Veres and Phil Boyd in Ward 2. Veres, an incumbent, said his biggest goal is to finish writing the ordinance for the Carnegie Volunteer Fire Department — something he says will enable the department to operate in a more business-like fashion. Boyd, a member of the Carnegie Zoning Board, could not be reached for comment.
The Carnegie mayoral race won't heat up until November, when incumbent Jack Kobistek faces current Councilman Mike Sarsfield on the Democratic ticket. Kobistek does not run in the primary because he is an Independent.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.