Keystone Oaks listed high in school rankings
Keystone Oaks High School has been named one of the best public high schools in a ranking released in April.
The 2013 U.S. News Best High Schools Rankings listed Keystone Oaks High School as 69th out of 687 schools in the state and 2,258th out of 21,000 schools across the country.
“One of the neat things about it is the study recognizes how hard students and teachers are working and performing on the items that the rankings measured,” high school Principal Scott Hagy said.
The ranking, which comes from the U.S. News &d World Report and the American Institute for Research, evaluates schools based on student performance on state assessments and how well the schools educate minority and low-income students. In addition, student performance on Advanced Placements tests is used to gauge how well schools prepare students for postsecondary education.
“I think we do a fantastic job here in the district,” Hagy said. “It's sort of a district that's like a little secret — people don't give it enough recognition.”
Other Allegheny County high schools ranked in the study were:
• Upper St. Clair — seventh in state, 440th in nation.
• Mt. Lebanon — 11th, 510th.
• North Allegheny — 12th, 605th.
• Quaker Valley — 14th, 645th.
• Hampton — 18th, 685th.
• Fox Chapel — 25th 853th.
• South Fayette — 37th, 1,167th.
• Riverview — 45th, 1,438th.
Megan Guza is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5810 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.