Carnegie Screenwriters' short film about ketchup long on irony
The scene opens on a couple holding hands over an expensive, elegant dinner. The gorgeous French woman takes her twice-baked Belgian crepe. Two small cups sit in front of her: one of ketchup, and one of mayonnaise. Her date watches her intently. She reaches for the mayo, and his face falls.
The short film, produced by the Carnegie Screenwriters, won in the audience favorite category at the Pittsburgh Filmmakers' Film Kitchen annual theme contest. This year's theme was ketchup.
“I can't say I've ever directed a film about ketchup before,” said director Jim Helfrich, a Carnegie Screenwriters member. “But it was a lot of fun.”
The screenplay for the four-minute film was the brainchild of Eoin Carney, an Irish-born playwright and web designer who recently joined the Carnegie Screenwriters.
“I saw an advertisement and thought, ‘I must enter this contest,'” Carney said. “I wrote the script and then realized, ‘This isn't the end of it.'”
Having to travel to Alaska for a film festival, Carney left his script in the hands of the Carnegie Screenwriters.
“I wasn't expecting much, but they made it a movie,” he said.
While the film was a few minutes long, the process took much longer. Helfrich said the script was finished on a Saturday, and the screenwriters were filming by Monday.
The eight hours of filming took place over two days, with many of the scenes being shot at Carnegie's 3rd Street Gallery and the rest at Suzy's Deli.
“You'd spend two hours shooting for a scene that's going to be on screen for 20 seconds,” Helfrich said.
Megan Guza is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5810 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Add Megan Guza to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.