Elementary school renovations at Carlynton contribute to budget increase
There will be a substantial increase in spending next year in the Carlynton School District to account for high-profile capital improvements.
The board at its June 24 meeting approved the district's $32,224,514 budget for the 2013-14 school year. This is up nearly $9 million from $23.8 million in 2012-13.
A bulk of the increase comes from $7 million set aside for planned renovations to both Crafton and Carnegie elementary schools, according to district business manager Kirby Christy.
“There is a line item in the budget for $7 million that is related to the board's intent to renovate the two elementary schools,” he said.
A state-mandated increase for teacher pensions also accounts for part of the spending increase.
The budget also includes a drop in the millage to 19.089 from 23.15, Christy said. The drop includes the need to remain revenue neutral in compliance with the county's property reassessments.
There were no funding or staffing cuts made for the coming year, Christy said.
Helpful to area schools will be the budget signed into law last week by Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Corbett. The budget includes $5.5 billion earmarked for basic education, which is the primary source of aid for public schools. That is an increase of $122 million from last year.
Megan Guza is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5810 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.