Scott Conservancy awarded $15K grant
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Wednesday, July 10, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
The Scott Conservancy has been chosen to receive a $15,000 grant that will go toward environmental upkeep in the township.
Conservancy treasurer Jane Sorcan said the money will be used to make improvements to the Kane Wood Nature Area.
Also included in the grant, provided by the Laurel Foundation, is money that can be used to purchase office equipment for the organization. Sorcan said it also will be used to promote new membership.
Sorcan said some of the money will be used to create better access to the township's trail system, and erosion and drainage issues along some of the trails will be addressed. A small bridge will be built across the stream along Tom the Tinker Trail, and Neville's Trade Trail will be graded and compacted, she said.
“Laurel Foundation has been a great supporter of the Scott Conservancy in the past,” Sorcan said. “They were instrumental in the original purchase of the Kane Woods Nature Area property, and it was with their support that we were able to make many of the improvements that opened the area up for community use.”
The Pittsburgh-based Laurel Foundation was established in 1951 and provides grants in areas such as the arts, culture, environment and conservation and community development.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.