Skatepark groundbreaking in Carnegie quells doubters
Mary Pitcher's delayed dream of building a skatepark in memory of her sons became a tangible one on Sunday evening.
Organizers broke ground for Pitcher Park Memorial Skatepark in Carnegie Park, nearly five years to the day after two of her sons, Stephen and Vincent, drowned during a camping trip.
“This is an exciting day,” said Pitcher, of Scott. “This is a very exciting day.”
Leaders picked Carnegie Park after considering sites in Dormont, Mt. Lebanon and Scott.
Carnegie Mayor Jack Kobistek called the park a “godsend.”
“This will be a nice, wholesome, safe place for kids to play,” he said. “This will be an avenue for them to take their skills to the next level.”
Seattle-based Grindline Skateparks designed the park and will carry out construction, which begins Aug. 1. The finished park will include a large, full pipe, a bowl 4 to 6 feet deep, a bowl 8 to 10 feet deep and a street course with various obstacles.
A seven-person crew from Grindline will spend four to five months working on the park. Pitcher's foundation is providing an apartment and equipment for the crew.
“I think people thought I was crazy. There were many doubters,” she said.
Pitcher said she hopes the park will become a place not just for fun but for people to show their skills.
“There are so many talented, skilled skaters here, and they have nowhere to go,” she said.
The $600,000 park has been funded mostly through a grant from the Ken & Carol Schultz Foundation, an Arizona nonprofit run by Bridgeville native Ken Schultz. The Pitcher Park Foundation, formed by Pitcher to help further her skatepark dreams, raised the remaining 15 percent of the money.
Additional funds are being raised to build a spectator area.
Megan Guza is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5810 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.