Swallow Hill Road repair plans dragging for some
Scott Township's plans to repair Swallow Hill Road are progressing, but at a pace slower than commissioners had hoped.
Township engineer Larry Lennon said at the commissioners' July 9 meeting that utility companies have been notified of the upcoming road work, and asked if they have any work to do in the Swallow Hill area so that the projects can be coordinated.
Lennon said field surveys and traffic counts also have been completed.
The project will include repairs to Swallow Hill Road between Greentree and Scrubgrass roads, and is estimated to cost $1.5 million.
Lennon said his firm, Lennon Smith Souleret Engineering Inc., has talked with contractors about the possibility of finishing the project by the end of the year. They believe at least one-third of the project can be finished by then.
Commissioners hope for more than that, though progress depends on PennDOT's ongoing Scrubgrass Road project. The detour from Scrubgrass takes drivers onto Swallow Hill, hence work cannot start there until the Scubgrass work is complete.
Lennon said PennDOT has indicated the project should finish by mid-September, a month after the original estimated completion date.
A public works committee meeting to discuss the Swallow Hills project is scheduled for 7 p.m. Aug. 5 at the municipal building. Bids will be opened Aug. 22, and commissioners expect to award a contract on Aug. 27.
Megan Guza is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5810 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.