Carlynton board, teachers reach five-year agreement
A contract agreement was reached Monday night between Carlynton School District and its teachers.
The school board unanimously approved a five-year agreement between the district and the Carlynton Federation of Teachers.
The teachers had been without a contract since the previous one expired on June 30.
“It is a contract much like the last one,” said David Roussos, board president. “Everyone got something but no one got everything.”
He said that while the negotiations were difficult, they also were productive and amiable.
In other business, the board approved the hiring of a sixth kindergarten teacher, most likely to teach at Crafton Elementary.
The number of currently enrolled kindergarten students combined with the number expected to enroll after the start of the school year puts the five kindergarten classrooms at a high capacity. Currently, there is no room for another kindergarten class in Carnegie.
Despite the hiring, issues remain, including how the district will determine which students go to the third Crafton class — that is, whether students who live in the Carnegie Elementary area will have to go to Crafton Elementary, where there is more room.
“I do not support forcing anyone to go from one school to another,” Roussos said.
The board discussed giving parents the option of voluntarily moving their children from one school to another. Board member Nyra Schell said students should go where there is room, regardless of their residence.
“It is a situation beyond anyone's control,” she said.
The board plans to pick up the issue at its Aug. 12 meeting.
Megan Guza is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5810 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Add Megan Guza to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.