ShareThis Page

Carnegie program features Carlynton grad's script

Megan Guza
| Wednesday, July 31, 2013, 9:01 p.m.

A Carlynton graduate's dramatic script came to life last week with a staged reading of the work at Carnegie's Third Street Gallery.

The short script, “Roost,” written by 2013 Carlynton valedictorian Lana Meyer, was performed by local actors as part of the Third on Third, Local Actors Reading Local Writers series.

“It's just so exciting,” Meyer said. “I can't believe this many people came out to see it.”

Meyer's script won first place in the dramatic script category at the National Scholastic Art and Writing Competition, an award that saw her honored at Carnegie Music Hall in New York last month.

While Meyer had seen her work read before — at the City Theatre on the South Side — she was anxious to see it again now that more time had passed.

“It's almost the one-year anniversary,” she said. “I'm sure the way I view it has evolved over time, since a year ago.”

More than 40 people turned out to see the performances — a standing room-only crowd.

When the City Theatre performed “Roost,” the performances were mainly for students on school trips. Meyer said it felt strange to be watching her script read with a room full of strangers.

“Now it feels like it matters more,” she said. “It feels like there's a lot more at stake.”

The piece centers on Josephine Grissom, a Great Depression-era chicken farmer just barely keeping her head above water. She is four months pregnant and on her own when her newly-wealthy ex-flame returns to town – with his young, ditzy bride. ‘Jo' is determined to do what she must to keep her farm afloat – whatever it takes.

“Scraping by – that's what I said, right? Then that what I'll do,” Jo says.

Meyer wanted to write about desperate people, she said, and rural Depression-era Texas is “about as desperate as it gets.”

Megan Guza is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5810 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.