Search nearing an end for new library director in Carnegie
The search for a new executive director for the Andrew Carnegie Free Library and Music Hall in Carnegie is entering its final stages.
Amanda Sargent, acting president of the library board of trustees and head of the search committee, said the team of five has narrowed the field of applicants to four finalists. Final interviews are set for next week.
The initial focus of the search committee, Sargent said, was to revise the job description of the executive director.
“We decided our focus for the new executive director really needed to (be) more on the development side,” she said. “We want it to be less administration and more development.”
She said the committee hopes to make a final recommendation to the library board of trustees by the July 31 board meeting. Depending on the availability of the chosen candidate, she said, the new hire would start in early or mid-August.
“There are a lot of really good candidates,” she said. “Most are local or have ties to the Pittsburgh area.”
The search committee is made up of Sargent, board members Pat Catena, Jim Denova and Jennifer Highfield, Marilyn Jenkins, executive director of the Allegheny County Library Association.
Denova had been president of the library board of trustees but stepped down on July 1, according to Sargent. Denova remains a member of the board, and bylaws dictate that until the end of the presidential term in March, Sargent will act as president.
The board will decide in March on a new president.
Megan Guza is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5810 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.