Flag ceremony a moving experience for entire Carnegie community
I want to thank the VFW Honor Guard, American Legion Riders, Carnegie Mayor Jack Kobistek and his lovely wife and everyone else who participated in the flag ceremony for my brother, Spec 4 Thomas Jester.
This is a wonderful tribute they are presenting in Carnegie.
Everyone should get involved. Call or stop at the VFW to pick up an application for a loved one who served or lost his life in combat.
You won't regret it.
It is a beautiful, moving ceremony that brings families and friends together to remember the veterans who fought to keep us free.
Response to July 4 letter
I would like to respond to the unhappy Carlynton parent (“Carlynton parent unhappy with schools” — July 4 Signal Item).
I have lived in Carnegie all my life. My husband and I graduated from the Carnegie-Carlynton School District. We raised three wonderful children, and all of them graduated from this school district. My youngest daughter has three children enrolled in Carlynton, and they are involved in sports and other activities.
My husband and I have the opportunity to attend most of their functions and are so pleased at the dedication the faculty and staff show these students. They are all to be commended for their work.
If you are unhappy with the school district, my advice to you is to stop complaining, get involved or move. There are a lot of affordable places to live other than Carnegie.
I was thrilled that the board of education did not allow Rosslyn Farms to go into another school district. According to the board, to keep Rosslyn Farms in the Carlynton School District proves that our curriculum is as good as other school districts.
We are very happy with the Carlynton School District and the Carlynton School Board.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.