Carlynton Board hires principal for high school
Carlynton High School students will find a new face in the principal's office when they return to classes Aug. 28.
The school board voted unanimously Monday night to approve the hiring of Michael Loughren to the position.
District superintendent Gary Peiffer said the search for a new high school principal has been a summer-long process.
“It was a priority to get a good person in here,” he said.
Loughren's hiring is effective immediately at a salary of $100,000 and other provisions laid out by the state, according to school board president David Roussos.
Loughren comes from Plum Borough High School, where he was assistant principal. He is a former Fox Chapel teacher.
“He is someone who wants to be here,” Peiffer said. “He wants to be a Carlynton Cougar.”
The board approved the following hirings: Larissa Russo, junior high head cheer coach; Jennifer Searles, assistant band director; Ashley Ferrar, secondary reading/English; Stephen Hope, guidance counselor; Allison Fekety; elementary special education; Kristen Tatara, elementary special education; and Nickolas Vayansky, elementary special education.
The board again tabled a motion to purchase a 2014 Ford F-350 truck for the maintenance department at a cost of $29,491. Several board members requested that the current truck undergo diagnostic testing to see how much it would cost to repair and maintain it.
Peiffer said the current truck is a 1997 Ford F-350.
The motion was tabled with the stipulation that member questions — including the resale value of the current truck, the cost to repair the current truck, and whether the option of buying a 2013 truck is viable — be explored. The board plans to take action one way or another at its next voting meeting.
Add Megan Guza to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.