Scout's project a win-win — for him and Bridgeville library
A South Fayette High School junior is one step closer to reaching the coveted status of Eagle Scout, and the Bridgeville Public Library has a new butterfly garden.
Wiatt Mauti, who has been a scout for more than a decade, turned the hilly embankment beside the library parking lot into a butterfly garden full of wildflowers as part of his project requirements for becoming an Eagle Scout.
“It was a weed-covered hill last fall,” he said.
To become an Eagle Scout – the highest rank attainable in Boy Scouts – scouts must obtain 21 merit badges, reach certain ranks throughout the program, hold leadership positions, have a certain number of service hours and complete a service project.
Mauti is two merit badges away from completing the requirements.
“There were some moments between Cub Scouts and Boy Scouts when I thought, ‘There's no way I'm ever going to be able to do it, it's just too much work,'” he said. “But it's already here.”
Mauti said the idea came to him after library director Donna Taylor spoke to the troop leader about things that needed done around the library. He and about 10 family members and other troop members spent a day in October weeding the 126-foot-long hillside and laying down black tarps.
In May, after much research on native wildflowers and butterfly bushes, Mauti and his friends did their planting. Mauti said he and his father spent time researching different types of butterfly bushes and decided on one that was native to this region.
The garden also includes day lilies and other annuals and perennials.
Taylor said she hopes to get benches to put near the garden and have future children's programs there.
Megan Guza is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5810 or email@example.com.
Add Megan Guza to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.