Let there be (LED) light at new Collier recreation center
A grant from Allegheny County will help Collier Township officials illuminate the township's new recreation center in an energy-efficient way.
The grant, worth $75,000 from the county redevelopment authority's community, infrastructure, tourism fund, will go toward LED lights for the rec center rather than traditional lighting.
“Equipping the new community recreation center with LED lighting, the facility will be sustainable, energy- efficient and a fiscally responsible asset to our community,” township commissioners President Bob Schuler said.
The 38,356-square-foot center will include an Olympics-quality gymnasium, lounge, community room, party room, kitchen, dance and lecture rooms, and an elevated walking track — all of which will be lit with LED lights. Officials said the use of LED lighting will reduce total energy consumption between 40 and 50 percent, as compared to traditional incandescent lighting.
In other news:
• A third citation has been issued to someone suspected of illegal dumping, thanks to the hidden cameras funded by Keep Pennsylvania Beautiful.
Timothy J. Stawiarski, of Heidelberg is accused of dumping stone on the side of Fort Pitt Road on Aug. 17.
According to the citation, Collier police Chief Thomas Devin talked to Stawiarski, who said he did not do the dumping.
• Collier officials now are taking orders for memorial stones for the Veterans Memorial and Flag Day Monument. Each path stone can be inscribed with three lines of 13 characters.
The path now starts in front of the Flag Day Monument and continues to the ponds. The extended path will lead to the gazebo and, in the future, the entire length of the garden.
More information can be found on the township website.
Megan Guza can be reached at 412-388-5810 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Add Megan Guza to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.