Carlynton board closes in on revised bullying policy
Revisions to Carlynton School District's harassment and bullying policy are being considered by the school board, which heard the revisions for the first time at the Sept. 16 meeting.
The proposed policy clarifies the definition of bullying as something that occurs “when someone repeatedly and on purpose says or does unkind or hurtful things to another person who has a hard time defending him or herself.” It can be direct, indirect or relational. It also encourages students to report bullying or harassment not just to school faculty but to an adult at home, as well.
In the current policy, building principals are required to notify the superintendent about certain reported offenses, but the proposed policy removes that stipulation.
The final revised policy will be voted on Oct. 21.
In other business, the board approved a long-tabled motion to spend up to $29,491 for a new truck for the maintenance department. The motion had been held up by discussion regarding whether it would be more economical to repair and maintain the old truck or purchase a new one.
The board also approved the following finance items:
• August bills in the amount of $3 million.
• The August athletic fund report with an ending balance of $4,419.
• The August activities fund report with an ending balance of $40,690.
The board also approved hiring:
• John McAdoo as assistant principal of the junior-senior high school. He had been an English teacher in the district for more than 20 years before to being named assistant principal.
• Mary Ferro as a long-term substitute for Carnegie Elementary music classes and Susan Brossman as a long-term substitute for health and physical education at the high school.
Megan Guza is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5810 or email@example.com.
Add Megan Guza to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.