No great shakes in 2014 budget so far, as Carnegie officials begin process
Early discussions on the 2014 budget have begun in Carnegie Borough.
All six council members, the mayor, borough manager, public works manager and police chief met Monday to begin budget discussions.
Council Vice President Pat Catena said it is too early to tell whether the borough tax rate will remain flat or increase. The tax base, he said, should be stable.
“From the numbers I've seen, it should be relatively flat,” he said.
He said the preliminary budget numbers from each department are more of a wish list rather than final numbers, and departments will see their number pared down before the final budget is passed.
The budgets of public safety — which includes the police department — and public works department were highlighted at Monday's meeting.
From Jan. 1 through Sept. 30, the police department spent approximately $810,887, or 66.3 percent of its $1.223 million 2013 budget. That includes $32,314 in overtime so far this year.
The department is asking for an increase of $38,576 in 2014.
That increase would include the purchase of two new police fleet vehicles — the replacement of one and the addition of another.
The public works department has spent $606,364 of its $775,557 budget. The public works budget includes administration, winter maintenance and road maintenance.
The department is seeking a combined total of $880,187 for those three areas in 2014, including a 100-percent increase in winter maintenance — increasing the purchasing of rock salt from $60,000 to $120,000.
The council will hold its next budget meeting Oct. 21.
Megan Guza is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5810 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Add Megan Guza to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.