Noise from bike races disrupts Collier Township neighborhood
Collier Township officials will require a property owner to get proper permission before he holds any more bike races on his property.
The bike races took place on land that formerly was part of the Charles E. Kelly Support Facility, a military complex. The races are Cyclocross events, a form of rough-terrain bicycle racing. Developer Craig Cozza bought the land and is hosting the bike races.
Residents from Hilltop Road attended the Oct. 30 commissioners meeting to voice their frustrations with noise from the events. They said noise from the races is too loud, and riders and spectators come onto their properties.
“We have lived here in peace and harmony and quiet for 15 years, until these bike races became a disruption,” resident Troy Maxwell said.
Residents said the first race took place in June, with two more in September and October.
Township Manager Sal Sirabella said the property is zoned as residential, and the Cyclocross events are considered either private or commercial recreation. Collier zoning ordinances do not permit such recreational activities in residential zones.
Sirabella said the organizer has been warned, and should he hold another race without first getting proper variances, he will be cited.
“We have advised him that he cannot have this bike race on his property, as it is not zoned to do that,” he said. “What he can do is try to get that changed through a use variance.”
Cozza said the issue of spectators going onto residents' properties was an isolated incident that happened early in the summer.
“We try to be good neighbors,” he said. “It's something we thought was pretty harmless — a good community thing to do. The fact that they don't like it is a shame.”
Megan Guza is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5810 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.