School secession appeal hearing in Harrisburg Dec. 18
Rosslyn Farms petitioners will appear in Harrisburg before a representative from the state Department of Education next month in an appeal to a ruling against the borough's desire to secede from the Carlynton School District.
Rosslyn Farms originally petitioned the state in July 2011 to secede from Carlynton and join Chartiers Valley. Acting secretary of education Carolyn Dumaresq, then deputy secretary of education, issued the denial May 30. Petitioners then had 10 days to appeal the determination, which they did, leading to the Dec. 18 hearing.
Scheduling allows the hearing to carry over into Dec. 19, if necessary, but Carlynton Board of Directors president David Roussos said he hopes it can be completed in one day.
In other business, the board also approved a motion to renew a contract with the Allegheny Intermediate Unit.
The contract, which began a year ago, allows the district to go outside for its technology department.
The Intermediate Unit provides the district those services. The contract allows the Intermediate Unit to continue providing technology services for the 2013-14 school year.
The board also approved the following motions:
• Appointed Laura Sewell as playground aide at Crafton Elementary for 2.5 hours per day.
• Appointed Jayme Walzer as general cafeteria worker at Carnegie Elementary for three hours a day.
• Recalled Nancy McMullen from furlough and appointed her a Life Skills aide at Carnegie Elementary.
Megan Guza is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5810 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.