Carnegie officials get going about proposed GetGo
Carnegie officials say they are excited about the prospect of a GetGo convenience store and gas station coming to town.
Borough manager Stephen Beuter said the project would mesh nicely with the number of smaller specialty businesses that have opened in the borough.
“This project would create a nice balance,” he said.
The gas station, café and convenience store complex still is in the planning stages, but Giant Eagle Inc. representatives gave some details to the borough council during a Nov. 4 workshop meeting.
The location, in the 300 block of East Main Street, includes eight parcels of land between East Main and Lydia streets. Giant Eagle still is in the process of acquiring all the property, some of which includes privately owned businesses. The entire area is about 1.5 acres. The business would be open 24 hours.
Giant Eagle spokesman Dick Roberts said developers still are working to get the proper approvals to move forward with the project.
The gas-station portion of the business would include eight gas pumps with 16 spaces — one on each side of the pump. The indoor café area would include 34 seats, and there would be 16 seats outside. The entire land area, Giant Eagle representatives said, would have to be raised because part of it is in a flood plain.
Carnegie Mayor Jack Kobistek said that while the land would have to be rezoned for commercial use, he welcomes the idea of the convenience store coming to the borough.
The borough will benefit from the traffic and tax revenue, he said.
“I think these types of convenience stores that double as restaurants have become extremely popular with today's consumer,” he said. “And GetGo is very popular in today's market.”
Megan Guza is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5810 or email@example.com.
Add Megan Guza to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.