Library board extends three votes to Carnegie council members
Carnegie borough officials — who are appointed as ex officio members to the Andrew Carnegie Free Library & Music Hall board of trustees — again will have voting privileges on that board.
The library's bylaws allow for three borough council members to be named to the historic library's board, which can range from seven to 12 members. Council members had voting rights on the library board until a 2008 change to the bylaws.
“It caused some fallout,” said library Executive Director Maggie Forbes. “They had had that vote since 1901 — 107 years.”
The board decided in 2008 that having council members as voting library board members was a conflict of interest. Forbes stressed that this was the only reason for the amendment.
“It wasn't for any other reason than someone presenting it as a conflict of interest, since we ask them (borough council) for funding,” she said. Carnegie provides $30,000 annually, plus public works services, to the library.
The amendment restoring the voting rights was finalized on Nov. 20, and the 9-1 vote was finalized via email on Nov. 27.
The amended bylaws allow that “an ex officio shall have full privileges of board membership, except ex officio members may not serve as an officer of the board.”
Ex officio members are appointed yearly by Carnegie's council and mayor.
Library board member and Carnegie attorney Karyn Rok said after a tumultuous few years, she and others wanted to bring council members' voices back to the votes.
“When it comes to who is the expert, who better than the council people?” she said.
The library cycled through three executive directors and an interim between 2011 and early 2013 before Forbes returned. In April 2012, the borough council began placing its monthly payments to the library in escrow because of leadership and financial concerns. Council released the money and resumed payments in September 2012.
“I was so happy to see the council, when all of that was happening, they stayed involved,” Rok said. “I decided we needed to make a few changes, and one of them was restoring their voting rights.”
Forbes said she was “thrilled” with the change.
“It's one thing having a voice and having a say, but they should also have a vote,” she said. “Otherwise, it's just window dressing if you don't get the vote. It's a responsibility both ways.”
Carnegie Council President Rick D'Loss, who first was appointed to the library board in 2009, said it is appropriate for the appointed council members to have a vote.
“We do give the library money,” he said. “We are an interested party.” In addition to D'Loss, council members Sue Demko and Pat Catena currently serve on the library board.
Megan Guza is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5810 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Add Megan Guza to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.