Carnegie library counting on Civil War room as big attraction in 2014
The Andrew Carnegie Free Library & Music Hall ended 2013 on a high note by exceeding fund-raising expectations, and the historic center is poised to continue that success this year, officials said.
“In four months, the community was remarkably generous,” said Maggie Forbes, who returned to the library as its executive director in August.
The library has received more than $140,000 in donations since she came back, said Forbes, who previously led the hilltop, Italianite-style center in Carnegie from 2003 to 2011. Fund-raising in general has picked up, she said, and that needs to continue.
“We need to broaden that and deepen that and just find ways to make the library and music hall completely sustainable,” Forbes said.
In addition to many individual donations, the 113-year-old library also received two grants for general expenses: $25,000 from the Jack Buncher Foundation and $20,000 from the Laurel Foundation. The Massey Charitable Trust contributed $10,000 so that Diane Kleinfelter, a former library director, could be hired as curator for the second-floor Civil War room.
The room filled with artifacts, which once housed the Capt. Thomas Epsy Post No. 153 of the Grand Army of the Republic, a veterans group, will be one of the library's stars of 2014, Forbes said.
“The Civil War room is our national treasure, but those are only words until it is actually recognized nationally as a treasure,” she said.
Kleinfelter, who starts her new position this month, said she'll focus on outreach and exposure for the room.
“There are so many people, even locally, that don't know about it,” she said. “I will really be focusing on trying to bring regional – as well as even national – attention to the room.”
Forbes said she wants to highlight the room this year, in order to pull out all the stops in 2015 – the 150th anniversary of the end of the Civil War and Abraham Lincoln's death.
“As beautiful as the whole building is, this is the one-of-a-kind-in-the-country thing,” she said. “We need to really lay the groundwork for it.”
Forbes said she also wants to continue to highlight the music hall, patterned after Carnegie Hall in New York City. Resident companies who perform at the hall – Stage 62 and the Carnegie Performing Arts Center – often sell out, she said, and she hopes upgrades to the stage and hall will bring in new productions.
She also hopes to use the studio space in the library basement more often.
“It is a wonderful space, and it is underutilized,” she said. “Part of it is that we want to make people aware that it can be used for community events.”
The space is multi-functional, and could host anything from a birthday party to a concert series.
Forbes helped to raise $7.5 million to restore the center and return it to financial stability during her previous stint there. She hopes to reignite capital improvements there this year, including lightning, plaster and paint work in the library and air conditioning in the music hall.
“I think we're in a position to do that,” she said, although spending hasn't been determined. “It's clear we're in a much healthier place than we were.”
The goal, she said, is to bring more people to the library and show that it has something for everyone.
“The more people we get in the building, the more they discover its charms and the more they discover Carnegie's charms,” she said. “Carnegie is changing, and we like being a part of that.”
Megan Guza is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5810 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Add Megan Guza to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.