Heidelberg council gives nod to begin design work for playground
Heidelberg residents should see a refurbished Ellsworth Avenue Playground by fall, borough leaders said last week.
Council voted this month to allow borough engineers to begin project and engineering design for the Ellsworth Avenue Playground rehabilitation project.
The playground is 55 years old, and while it has seen some improvements over the years, borough manger Joe Kauer said, both the surface and equipment are in need of a face lift.
“The asphalt is full of very large cracks. The fencing has seen its day. The sidewalks are all buckled because the trees around there have just taken over,” he said.
A December grant from the state Department of Conservation and Natural Resources will help offset the project cost and help the borough to complete the project within the year. Kauer said preliminary designs put the cost around $132,000.
The $45,200 grant is part of nearly $2.4 million in park grants the borough has received over the past eight years.
In addition to landscaping and surface improvements, Kauer said, engineers plan to reuse some of the existing playground equipment and improve accessibility.
“Right now, the playground is in a raised bed,” he said. “It really isn't accessible for someone with special needs.”
He said the plan is not to redesign the playground, but rather improve it.
“In reality, what's up there is a great asset to the community. It fits well,” he said. “We don't want to reinvent the wheel.”
He said council members plan to meet within the month to finalize the initial design of the park. Council members hope to advertise for bids for the project in May and have construction under way by the summer in order to have the park open and complete by fall.
Add Megan Guza to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.