Agreement a win-win for Carnegie, emergency services
An ordinance passed last week by the Carnegie Borough Council spells out the expectations between the borough and the Carnegie Volunteer Fire & Rescue Bureau.
The ordinance also named the bureau the official fire company of the borough.
“We haven't done that in the past,” council President Pat Catena said. “The old ordinance recognized the paid fire department, which has been disbanded since the 70s.”
Representatives from the fire department could not be reached for comment.
The fire company is to provide the borough with emergency services and non-emergency and public service events or functions, such as clean-up after storms, according to the ordinance.
The borough, in turn, is required by the ordinance to establish a funding amount for the fire company in the borough's annual budget. The ordinance spells out what the money can be used for. The department must document how it uses the money.
“The borough is ultimately obligated to financially supporting the fire department,” Catena said.
The department must appoint a borough liaison who will meet with council every month to report on activities at the department. In October, the liaison, fire chief and borough president will meet to provide council with a report on operations and needs for the next year.
The ordinance had been in the works for two years. Council members had cited financial questions as hang-ups in negotiations with the fire department, namely the department's mortgage. The department still owes $680,000 on the building, and some council members looked to the department refinance the mortgage.
Megan Guza is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5810 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Add Megan Guza to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.