Chartiers Valley lands grant for engineering
A $253,000 grant from the Benedum Foundation will allow Chartiers Valley School District to develop an engineering consortium.
The grant will be disbursed over the course of two years.
The aim of the consortium is to make connections and build relationships with other districts in order to enhance the engineering programs throughout the area.
“We've used the Project Lead the Way program, but the downside is that training is very expensive,” said Chartiers Valley Superintendent Brian White. “The grant will help create the consortium to share training costs among districts – make it more affordable.”
Project Lead the Way is a national program designed to connect universities with high schools in engineering programs.
White said there are at least 10 other schools in Allegheny and Butler counties that are involved in Project Lead the Way. He said he has talked informally with representatives from several of the districts and interest is high.
“I hope, initially, it takes the form of a series of meetings with school districts interested in the program, focusing on what training is needed,” he said.
White said he also hopes the district can use the grant to develop a regional engineering summer camp, which would include two one-week caps open to 80 middle- and high-school students. Districts involved in the consortium would be able to participate in the camp.
Plans for the camp would take place over the next school year, he said.
Megan Guza is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5810 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.