Storm-water runoff can make Carnegie dog park a muddy mess
Dog owners who use the Carnegie Park dog park hope a rain garden will fix the storm-water runoff that creates a mud pit in the middle of the area — which, they say, is not just a nuisance, but dangerous.
“When the little dogs get flying around out there and hit that wet, muddy clay, they can hurt themselves,” said Bridget VanDorn, a Carnegie resident who takes her dog to the park.
She said dogs at the park — especially smaller ones — get muddy from the constant water draining into the park. She said she has seen some dogs spin out in the mud, and she and other owners worry it's only a matter of time before one gets hurt.
Borough council, dog owners and members of Carnegie's shade tree commission hope a rain garden will alleviate the problem.
A $10,000 grant for the garden was secured by shade tree commission member Bob Podurgiel. The borough will match 20 percent.
“It's always been somewhat of an issue,” council President Pat Catena said about the water runoff. “When we did more paving by the playground, that added more. The water follows that paved curve directly into the dog park.”
He said he is not sure why the issue was not addressed during construction of the dog park.
The rain garden, he said, will redirect runoff to an area where it can be absorbed underground before it gets to the dog park.
“The other concern is that the water runoff — as well as the water that's underneath — has the potential to wash the park down the hill,” said VanDorn, who also is a shade tree commission member.
Borough manager Stephen Beuter there is no time frame or design yet for the rain garden, but it will go near the entrance to the dog park.
Plants and gravel in a rain garden could collect water so it filters down into the ground slowly, as opposed to running into the dog park.
“Underneath the garden, in the part you don't see but that does a lot of work, is gravel, sand and different sizes of rocks,” she said. “It catches the water and holds it there.”
From there, she said, long-rooted water-absorbent plants work to suck up the water rather than letting it roll down the hill.
“It creates different filtration layers so the water will go down through them slowly,” she said. “The idea is to engineer an attractive and environmentally advantageous way to prevent runoff.”
Megan Guza is a staff writer for Trib Total Medial. She can be reached at 412-388-5810 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Add Megan Guza to your Google+ circles.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.