ShareThis Page

Water runoff on Carnegie's Plum Street addressed

Megan Guza
| Wednesday, April 23, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

Carnegie Borough engineers plan to tackle problems with stormwater runoff on Plum Street ahead of potential paving in coming years.

Borough Manager Stephen Beuter said plans are in the preliminary stages, and the borough's engineering firm, KLH Engineers, intends to survey the area to determine what can be done to curb the runoff issues.

The cost of the survey, approved April 14, is not to exceed $7,500.

KLH engineer Robert Robinson said that while Plum Street is relatively flat, it is tilted, which causes storm water to run off the road onto adjacent properties.

“There have been complaints in the past to the borough,” Robinson said. “The borough had addressed them the best they can by increasing the height of the curb, but there needs to be something more comprehensive.”

That plan likely will include adding a storm sewer system along Plum Street, which runs between Chestnut and Boquet streets.

“There is already a storm sewer system on Boquet Street, and we want to extend it to pick up Plum,” Robinson said. “We think we can do that, but we need to do this survey.”

Borough council President Pat Catena said Plum is high on a list of streets to be paved and refinished in coming years, and it is important to take care of runoff problems before the street is paved.

“What it comes down to is they can't pave the street until the sewage work is done,” Catena said. “They need to separate the storm and sanitary sewers, and that's basically what they're planning to do. Any work they do, though, requires a study.”

Megan Guza is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5810 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.