Chartiers Valley student creates pop art with a Coke
Chartiers Valley High School freshman Emily Smith is bringing a new definition to the term “pop art.”
Her digital rendition of a Coca-Cola bottle won third place in this year's Congressional Art Competition and will be displayed in the Washington, D.C., office of U.S. Representative Tim Murphy's (R-Upper Saint Clair).
Smith, 15, created the piece for her “Digital Art and Design” class.
“I don't even drink pop,” she said. “I thought it would be cool to make it a black and white image and then see the contrast.”
Done entirely on the computer, the piece began as an outline of the bottle. She then placed each hue inside the outline and blended them together. She said the red background makes the image pop.
Her teacher, Chris McHugh, called said the piece was “striking.”
“Digital art assignments were coming in, and I knew the deadline (for the competition) was soon,” he said. “I was going through and grading pieces, and when I saw Emily's final piece, I thought, ‘Wow, this is really awesome.'”
McHugh said he will be in Fairfax, Va., for a workshop this summer, and he plans to take a trip into Washington to see Smith's art.
This is the second year for the “Digital Art and Design” class, and, Smith said, it is the first time she has worked with digital art.
Smith said her mother and grandmother have helped foster her love of art, and it is something she hopes to continue doing through high school and college.
“You can do whatever you want. You're free to do whatever,” she said. “And if it doesn't work out, you can change it.”
Megan Guza is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5810 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Add Megan Guza to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.