ShareThis Page

No decision once again for massage-therapy business in Carnegie

Megan Guza
| Friday, July 18, 2014, 1:30 p.m.

Carnegie Borough officials declined on Monday to make a decision on the conditional use of Main Street property as a massage therapy business.

“I understand this is taking longer that a normal conditional-use hearing, but there were some things we had to find out,” said borough solicitor Joe Lucas.

The hearing was a continuation from June 9. Council questioned Qun “Melissa” Shen about the Thai massage business at 39 W. Main St. Shen applied in April for an occupancy permit and was denied.

At that hearing, Shen's son, Max, translated for her. Shen speaks Mandarin Chinese.

On Monday hearing, Shen brought Pittsburgh attorney Jesse Chen as a translator.

Chen translated Lucas' questions about the types of services that will be offered.

Shen previously owned a massage business in Turtle Creek. She sold the business in October 2012 when her younger son was born. Lucas asked about several adult-oriented websites that had references to the Turtle Creek business offering sexual favors.

Shen said she has not been associated with the business since she sold it, and that she had no knowledge of the websites.

Shen said to begin, she would be the only employee. She said her son mistranslated in June when he said here would be three other employees.

Through Chen, Shen said that if she hires more employees, she will advertise in New York. Shen lived in New York when she came to the United States in 2010. She said she can hire only those who speak Chinese, because she does not speak English. Shen received her state massage therapy license last month. She said she acted only as manager at her previous business. Before that, she said, she did not perform massages.

Anita Riley of Pittsburgh, owns the property on West Main Street. She was cited last in May for failure to obtain an occupancy permit for Shen. The business had begun operating upon signing the lease but before obtaining an occupancy permit. In June, Shen said through her son she did not know she needed to have the permit before opening. Council did not ask any more questions on that aspect Monday.

Council closed the hearing and has 45 days to make a decision.

Shen implored council to render a speedy decision.

Through Chen, she said that her options are limited because she does not speak English. Because of her children's schedules, she has trouble finding a job that allows those hours.

Council President Pat Catena said the decision will most likely be handed down at the August voting meeting.

Megan Guza is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5810 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.