ShareThis Page

Carnegie looks to address borough's flooding trouble spots

| Wednesday, Aug. 27, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

Carnegie officials have begun authorizing borough engineers to start projects they hope will reduce flooding in the borough.

About a dozen residents came to a special meeting with borough officials and engineers from the borough's engineering firm, KLH. Engineers John Mowry, Rob Horvat and Bob Robinson presented what Mowry called “low-hanging fruit” options that can be completed in the coming months.

Residents, in turn, expressed their desperation in finding a fix.

“There's just so much and so many things involved in this, and bless you for trying to figure all this out,” said Franklin Avenue resident Louise Stewart. “We hope you get to the bottom of it, but this is outrageous — these things that are happening — and we have to do something to stop all this. This water is just destroying our homes.”

Engineers identified several areas for which they have begun the design process for work they say will stem runoff issues in the area of the intersection of Franklin and California avenues and Charles Street. About 250 households suffered moderate to severe damage in a storm June 28, most of them in the Franklin/California/Charles area. About 2 inches of rain fell in one hour that day.

“We have uncovered things, but we ask you to bear with us. It's only been two months,” Mowry said.

The engineers said that in order to stem the runoff on Franklin and California, steps have to be taken above those streets on Cooks Lane, Wabash and Fleck Court. On Wabash, engineers plan to build drainage areas, as the street currently has none.

Drainage on Cooks Lane and Fleck Court also will be improved, and debris and other blockages were removed from pipes near Fleck. Near Carnegie Park, Mowry said, runoff will be alleviated once the storm sewer associated with the borough's skate-park project is finished. A sewer line was added for the project.

At Charles and Knox streets, engineers are planning a relief storm sewer that will connect to an existing 54-inch culvert pipe, which will be better able to handle the volume of water.

Mowry said the investigation into runoff problems on Washington Avenue are ongoing.

“The problem wasn't created overnight,” he said. “We want to be very careful with this.”

Motions by council to allow the engineers to complete designs for Cooks Lane and Wabash Avenue drainage improvements were approved Aug. 4, with a cost not to exceed $35,000. Last week, council authorized engineers to complete designs for a bypass culvert at Charles Street and Knox Avenue. The bypass culvert will direct water into a larger pipe that can handle the amount of runoff from that area, which will keep the sewer systems from backing up into the street.

Megan Guza is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5810 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.