ShareThis Page

Connoquenessing Valley Elementary science fair challenges students to 'think outside the box'

| Wednesday, April 3, 2013, 9:01 p.m.
Louis Raggiunti | Cranberry Journal
Josie Walters, a fourth grader at Connoquenessing Valley Elementary School, used the Science Fair as an opportunity to show her project, 'How Snakes are Misunderstood.'
Louis Raggiunti | Pine Creek Journal
Keaton Meek, a second grader at CVE, looks over the project 'How a DC Motor works.'
Louis Raggiunti | Pine Creek Journal
Benjamin Walsh looks at John Cowell's first grade volcano project.
Louis Raggiunti | Pine Creek Journal
Jenna Brown, a fourth grade student at CVE, experiments with how the density of different liquids work together.
Louis Raggiunti | Pine Creek Journal
Kelli Ann Trimbel, second grade, and the project called 'How Lightning Strikes.'

There was a bit of botany involved in Connoquenessing Valley Elementary School's sixth annual science fair.

“We're planting little seeds in their heads that science is fun,” said Carrie Hubler, science fair chairperson and member of the school's parent-teacher organization.

This was the second year for the PTO to organize the entire event and Hubler's second time with a science-fair focus. Students from kindergarten through the fourth grade volunteered to take part in the event.

“We had a lot more than last year,” said Hubler, a Cranberry resident. “One hundred and fifty two kids signed up. That's more than 20 percent of the school.”

The children rose to the occasion, coming up with unique and compelling ideas that stretched their creativity.

“We wanted them to think outside the box,” she said, recalling a few of the projects that caught her attention.

There was a catapult that shot marshmallows, geode, rock and shell collections, volcanoes, flower dyeing, and mixing candy and soda pop to watch it explode, just to name a few.

“There was one about smelling,” she said. “I thought the Swiss cheese smelled like cocoa butter, and I have a pretty good nose.”

While students answered questions from Seneca Valley seniors who roamed the cafeteria, others engaged in a scavenger hunt. The senior high students, “extra hands when we needed them,” Hubler said, made certain each child had the opportunity to explain the finished project.

“We wanted to pay attention to each kid individually,” Hubler said.

One mother sent a note, thanking her for singling out each child.

Josie Walters, 10, from Cranberry, brought a special friend to the fair, Cora, her corn snake. The fourth-grader used the reptile to show what senses snakes and humans share.

“A snake has its cochlea in its jaw,” she said. “They put their jaw against the ground to hear vibrations.”

While some of her students were shocked at seeing Cora, Josie said, they got used to it.

She credits Mrs. Gaydosz, her teacher, for getting her interested in science and the fair.

Jenna Brown, a student in Mrs. Tobin's class, also appreciated her teacher's encouragement to participate in the science fair.

The 9-year-old made a rainbow in a jar to explain the scientific principle of density.

“Me and my mom found it online,” she said.

With rubbing alcohol, corn syrup, water, olive oil, blue dish soap and food coloring, Jenna created bands of color.

“They were all the same amount, but they weighed differently,” she said.

Each band held its shape and didn't mix with the others.

Christin Jamery, acting principal at the school, found the fair as a “great way to experience project-based learning.” And she credited the PTO for organizing this successful event.

Parents and grandparents visited to support their children, Hubler, 37, a mother of two, said, and the community got behind the effort with donated prizes.

“I don't know how we'll top it next year,” she said. “I like supporting science and the little guys and girls.”

Dona S. Dreeland is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-772-6353 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.