ShareThis Page

CycleCT to provide added safety to cyclists, pedestrians in Cranberry

| Wednesday, June 19, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Cyclists like Brandon Linton are excited about the prospect of a more cycling-friendly climate in Cranberry Township.
Brandon Linton and cyclists like him would benefit greatly from CycleCT, a plan to make Cranberry Township more condusive to cycling.

When Brandon Linton was diagnosed with diabetes six years ago he needed to find a way to stay active and healthy.

Linton, 18, eventually turned to cycling 1,500 miles a year around Cranberry.

“Cycling just stuck out as a way to control blood sugars and keep healthy,” Linton said.

Now, Cranberry Community Planner Joe Shafer hopes more of the township's residents like Linton turn to non-motorized transportation with the employment of CycleCT.

CycleCT is the implementation phase of the township's Bike and Pedestrian Connections Plan, adopted in 2011, to connect safe cyclist and pedestrian routes throughout the community to enable an alternative to motorized transportation.

“This is a spinoff plan of the township's overall comprehensive plan, the Cranberry Plan, from 2009,” Shafer said.

“It was determined during that process that one of the top concerns of the residents in the community was improving bicyclist and pedestrian connections throughout the entire township,” Shafer said.

Shafer also said CycleCT benefits the township in the long-term.

“We want Cranberry to be a sustainable, growing community where people want to live for the long term with a high quality of life,” Shafer said.

CycleCT's first segment was implemented last August along a 3.5-mile stretch from Graham Park down to the township's southern border with Marshall Township at Thorn Hill Road.

That initial segment consisted solely of making road markings and putting up signage, which cost $7,510, to make motorists aware that they should share the road with cyclists.

Linton is already seeing more cyclists on the road.

“When I started you really couldn't find many cyclists in this area, but as time has progressed demand has really increased,” Linton said.

While some motorists might not like to share the road, cyclists are not supposed to ride on sidewalks in order to avoid accidents with pedestrians.

“The state recognizes [cyclists] as being allowed on all roads except interstate highways and that's where they belong, but we're not talking about senior citizens or kids that wouldn't be comfortable on the road,” Shafer said.

However, Shafer also said cyclists should opt for sidewalks in unsafe conditions.

Only five combined accidents between motorists and cyclists were reported in the township in 2011 and 2012, three of which were caused by cyclists and two by motorists.

“If you don't feel like riding on the roads are safe, whether it's because of motorists, or gravel or glass on the road, you'll be better off on the sidewalk,” Shafer said.

Road markings and signage were also recently put up along the 1.6-mile Graham School Road, which cost $2,240. Similar work is currently being done along 0.6 miles of Mars Road, just north of Cranberry Commons, to create a bike route parallel to Route 228.

Future north-south cycling signage may be implemented on Franklin Road, Powell Road and Route 19, while east-west signage may eventually be put up along Glen Eden Roadand Rochester Road.

However, Shafer said decisions on where to implement CycleCT occur on a year-by-year basis.

“We try to figure it into the budget, and we try to program it in with other roads and bigger road improvement projects,” Shafer said.

Shawn Annarelli is a freelance writer with Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.